Wednesday, July 15, 2009

I have found this article

http://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/testing/animalalt/2412866.html

Cosmetic are the best invention on earth because it covers flaws but i think it didnt cover a sin called animal testing.

*Warning* I might sound emotional on the entry.

Animal testing is foolish to me because animals are not the main consumer. Would they even say "ouch this is harmful to my skin" " Oh, this is so comfortable".. They wouldnt. Only the machine would. We are the ones who use it we test it on ourselves.

Imagine your dog and cats get abducted and got some cosmetic testing. They died or something bad happen to them. Who is responsible for their lifes?

We are!

I agree with Diy animals are still considered as inferior to us. But no matter what it's a life and a little life with feelings. Why are we even considering using a life to be a guinea pig to test all the products we dont dare to try on ourselves?

If we are scared to test it on ourselves, would you think the animal is not scared?

Even if it is testing for medical purposes or a good cause, it's already morally wrong.

That's what I think. We measure too much things, feared too much things but we didnt realised we have worsened too many things.

Rosy

1 comment:

  1. “If [animal testing is] proven to reduce suffering through animals tests, it's not wrong to use them,” said Aziz in the interview.

    wtf. i don't think animals should have to suffer in order for our vanity to be justified. all these scientists/neurosurgeons or whatever should seriously put their brain cells to work by coming up with alternative methods of testing cosmetics.

    -diy. aaahhh harry potter! woohoooo

    ReplyDelete